Skip to main content
Search US website

Read This Before Your Next Meeting

8 Comments

August 12, 2011

Related Topics:

OPEN Forum Message

Company Culture

Can you recognize signs that your company's culture isn't working? Get advice from the experts on what to look for–and how to fix it.

Learn more

Meetings get a bad rap. The complaints typically are that they are too long and boring. Some attendees rant that unprepared PowerPoint presenters just put them to sleep. But, meetings matter for every small company owner since most relationship building and decision making still gets conducted face to face.

How can you have business meetings, but ensure they are always productive?

In his new book, Read This Before Our Next Meeting (part of Seth Godin’s Domino Project), Al Pittampalli shows how to fundamentally change the way people meet to get their most important work done. He complains that traditional meetings create a culture of compromise and kill company urgency. Pittampalli suggests six ways to make meetings more productive:

1. Meet only to support a decision that has already been made 

The successful meeting must have “a bias for action.” According to Pittampalli, a meeting should only focus on two activities: Resolve conflict and to lead coordination of action.

2. Move fast—end on time

Set a time limit for each meeting. Pittampalli reminds us that “Every meeting costs a fortune. Spend it wisely.” The leader of the meeting needs to announce how long the meeting will be. Start and end on time by only discussing the relevant issues and actions that need to be taken right now.

3. Limit attendees to the meeting

Too many people get invited to meetings where their participation is not essential. The more people attending a meeting, the more people that need to agree to take an action. This slows down the meeting process. Pittampalli believes every attendee needs to ask themselves two questions before attending: Do I add critical value sitting in the meeting? Can I  give my opinion in advance of the meeting?

4. Reject attendees that are unprepared

Create an agenda and send material in advance for  everyone to be prepared. This way, the discussion can begin at the start of the meeting and no one needs to be "brought up to speed." Pittampalli says that agendas need to state the problem, the alternatives and  what decisions will be made at the meeting. Marshall Makstein, the  co-founder of eSlide, a custom design and visual consulting firm, says that the most important time is this pre-meeting planning. "We have seen hours, weeks, months go into critical meetings that may last 1 hour, and result in a million or even billion dollar deal."

5. Create committed action plans

Pittampalli insists that every meeting should have a plan of action at its conclusion including: What action is being committed to? and Who is responsible for each action and when will it be completed?

6. Work with brainstorms

Pittampalli has detailed guidelines around how brainstorming exists inside effective meetings. These include only inviting people that are passionate about the idea and who can praise other people's ideas liberally. Don't invite the Vice President of No to your meeting. Most importantly, use a strong outside facilitator that can lead a timely brianstorming session.

Here are more great tips by OPEN Forum's Katie Morell and Liz Strauss on how to have successful meetings.

Listen to my entire interview with Al Pittampalli! 

What changes have you made inside your company to have more productive meetings?

What do you think?

Member avatar

Join the conversation ( 8 )

  • Mathew Georghiou 9 months ago

    Mathew Georghiou

    These sounds like good tips, and it's good to see recognition that meetings can be useful when done properly.Here's a tip that I have used many times in the past. Print the following 3 phrases in very large type,each on its own piece of paper (fold in half to sit likea tent card): Don't Digress; Get to the Point; Time. Put the papers on the meeting table in plain site. They will act as a constant reminder to everyone to avoid digressing, to be concious of time, and to get to the point. Simple but it works.

  • Jennifer Norene 9 months ago

    Jennifer Norene

    I like this article except #1. Would be unrealistic to only meet to finalize decisions already made. Sounds good but not so realistic. Many meetings are created to collaborate and hear points of view and make a decision. I would say: commit to make a decision with a set time frame, instead of make the decision prior to the meeting.

      • Julie Rains 8 months ago

        Julie Rains

        Loved the book and your interview with Al (my article on this topic is forthcoming!). I mostly agree with the concept of #1 (meet to support decision) but did find the idea somewhat confusing upon first considering what is supposed to happen in the "modern meeting." This model doesn't work for every type of decision but for many -- make a preliminary decision (perhaps keeping in mind alternatives or the narrow choices as you mentioned) and then meet to address any concerns and uncover information you didn't know previously. Having a decision means you are capable of deciding and ready to move forward while still considering others' points of view.

Crash Courses

Tax Deductions for Your Business

Think you're paying too much in business taxes? Learn more about some possible deductions with our latest crash course.

Launch Course

Javascript is currently disabled. Please enable javascript for the optimal OPEN Forum experience.

All users of our online services subject to Privacy Statement and agree to be bound by Terms of Service. Please read.

© 2012 American Express Company. All rights reserved.