Skip to main content
Search US website

Telecommuting is Not Just an HR Perk

3 Comments

July 2, 2010

Related Topics:

OPEN Forum Message

Business Forecasting 2012

Our special feature on forecasting sheds light on how to choose the right model, offers advice from Jack Stack and more.

Get started

Telecommuting emerged as a concept back in the mid '70s when former NASA rocket-scientist turned researcher, Jack Nilles, was summoned from California to Washington to do a secret briefing on his work. 

 

Told to be there the next morning, he packed up his overhead projector slides, endured a red-eye flight across the country, and arrived bleary-eyed only to have the meeting repeatedly rescheduled and then canceled late in the day.

 

On the flight home that night he realized an encrypted videoconference link to the Pentagon—installed two floors above his office—which could have saved him from two sleepless nights and a wasted day. He realized a "telecommunications transportation tradeoff" was possible, and (thankfully) coined the words "telework" and "telecommuting."

 

Alvin Toffler understood the problem back then, too. In Future Shock (Random House 1970) he wrote, ''In a country that has been moaning about low productivity and searching for new ways to increase it, the single most anti-productive thing we can do is ship millions of workers back and forth across the landscape every morning and evening.''

 

By the '80s, traffic delays in metropolitan areas had doubled, and companies began experimenting with remote office sites to see if their employees could work effectively from offices near their homes. What they found was that productivity rose almost 20 percent, and they saved money using lower cost suburban space instead of expensive downtown offices. While fax machines were widely used to send a few pages across the country, FedEx came along back in those days with the audacious promise that they could deliver whole documents overnight.

 

By the 1990s, traffic congestion had tripled compared to the '70s and word was spreading that many work-related trips weren't necessary. The 1994 earthquake near Los Angeles reinforced the idea that distributed offices were a good idea. About that time the Internet made it possible for work to go to workers, instead of workers going to work. Email and file sharing were changing the nature of how we did business.

 

In 2000, Congress enacted a little-known law requiring all federal agencies to set up telecommuting programs, and decreed that federal workers should telecommute to the maximum extent possible. Largely ignored, the events of 9/11 underscored the need for operation continuity plans. 

 

Additional legislation approved by the Senate, but stalled in the House, aims to put more teeth in the federal programs by requiring agencies not to just show why workers should telecommute, but requiring it unless proof could be shown that the job prevented it.

 

Occasional telecommuting grew significantly as the first decade of the 21st century drew to a close, increasing 74 percent from 2005 to 2008, though few companies had adopted it as a regular, multiple days per week, business practice. In fact, only about 2 percent of private workers and 5 percent of federal workers telecommute on a regular basis, although GSA says 61 percent could. In 2009, 12 members of Congress urged the House Transportation Committee and House Committee on Energy and Commerce to include telework incentives in the nation's energy and transportation laws.

 

In March of 2010, the White House Conference on Workplace Flexibility put its stamp on the importance of telecommuting for continuity of operations and fair employment. With uncharacteristic foresight, the federal budget for 2011 calls for a 50 percent increase in telework, and both the House and Senate have bills designed to enforce federal telework mandates because of worries over weather calamities, diseases, terrorism, and fuel prices. The economic mess of 2009 to 2010 has encouraged thousands of out of work people to take up freelancing. And one in four households have dropped their landline telephones in favor of mobile communications.

 

What if Congress authorized federal investment in a hypothetical Giganet System with a Federal Internet Act of 2010, just as the Interstate Highway System was authorized by the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956? Like highways, an Internet superhighway would be an investment in, to quote an Interstate Highway document, "a new, higher speed, lower cost technology which fundamentally alters relationships between time, cost, and space in a manner that would allow new economic opportunities to emerge that would never have occurred otherwise." With the cost per lane-mile of urban highway at almost $4 million, and the cost per mile of information superhighway at $20,000, it should be a no-brainer.

 

There's also been some talk that Google's enlightened self-interest might result in a nationwide free WiMax service. Based on our imaginary Giganet as a backbone, it would be a pivotal piece that could revolutionize they way we work. Starting with remote communities, those with fewer job options, it would not only boost Google's click-through ad revenue, but also help put our economy back on its feet. 

 

In 2000, we looked back on 1980 and wondered how we managed to live without personal computers and cell phones. In 2020, we'll look back at 2000 and wonder how we managed without free online access everywhere, and why we accepted separate services for entertainment, information, and communications.

 

Telecommuting offers benefits for everyone, too. Highway congestion would be a thing of the past if those that could work at home (about 40 percent of the workforce) did so just half the time (the current average). It would take the equivalent of 10 million cars off the road, and people who still had to go to an office to work could enjoy what would again be super highways. 

 

Cities would be revitalized as access became easier. Baby Boomers could assume roles as online mentors, tutors, and educators. Thanks to them, and to modern telecommunications, universities would no longer be accused of having an edifice complex as students learned from home — something that an extensive IBM study showed is more effective than traditional learning. Disabled veterans and others with handicaps could have access to employment as easy as their able-bodied neighbors.

 

Our GNP would probably increase too, as study after study has shown that telecommuting increases productivity from 15-50 percent, although some argue that much of that results from people spending more time working. And that may be true—studies show that teleworkers are willing to put in up to 58 hours a week (while reporting greater job satisfaction), while their office counterparts feel that 38 hours is too much.

 

Economic, environmental, and continuity of operations demands suggest that telecommuting is more than an HR perk and should be a fundamental business strategy adopted, at the very least, by any company that has people sitting in front of a computer all day.

 

Over the past thirty years, Kate Lister has owned and operated several successful businesses and arranged financing for hundreds of others. She’s co-authored three business books including Undress For Success—The Naked Truth About Making Money at Home (Wiley, 2009) and Finding Money—The Small Business Guide to Financing (2010). Her blogs include Finding Money Advice and Undress4Success.  

What do you think?

Member avatar

Join the conversation ( 3 )

  • Jean Aw 1 year 6 months and 6 days ago

    Jean Aw

    love reading about how telecommuting was coined!

  • MARTHA HARBIN 1 year 6 months and 26 days ago

    MARTHA HARBIN

    I work from home operating my own consulting business and only rarely have encountered a situation that caused me to wish I had an office. Recently I've been perusing the want ads in my somewhat-annual debate between the benefits of predictable income versus the variable-though higher-income I earn from my business. There are a number of intriguing positions out there that I know I could perform successfully, but all are in major metropolitan areas where I'm not willing to live. What so amazed me about these positions was that none entertained the notion of telecommuting though all are in the business of electronic communications.

  • Beth Arvin 1 year 6 months and 28 days ago

    Beth Arvin

    Thanks for this insightful article, Kate. Companies of all shapes and sizes will soon find that telecommuting is essential to their business model if they hope to remain competitive and not be crushed by the weight of their own unneeded overhead expenses.

    The concept of having all employees working the same hours under the same roof is a luxury of a bygone era. The evolution of technology and communication has reshaped how companies operate and people work. The future of business is leaner, smarter and more responsive.

    Today's savvy clients don't attach value to lavish offices. They want to be confident that they are investing in results, not overhead and that they are paying for talent and expertise, not conference rooms and copiers.

    For more on this topic, here is an article from Fame Foundry that examines other inefficiencies of maintaining unnecessary physical office space. While it pertains specifically to the marketing industry, it applies equally to many other sectors that have been slow to accept the wisdom of going virtual: http://www.famefoundry.com/1447/10-things-you-pay-for-from-traditional-marketing-agencies.

    Fame Foundry
    http://www.famefoundry.com

Crash Courses

Earn 72+ IQ Points

Cutting Business Costs

Smart business owners always look for opportunities to reduce unnecessary costs. Learn what costs to cut - or not to cut.

Launch course

Javascript is currently disabled. Please enable javascript for the optimal OPEN Forum experience.

All users of our online services subject to Privacy Statement and agree to be bound by Terms of Service. Please read.

© 2012 American Express Company. All rights reserved.