Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Open.com Navigation
Our special feature on forecasting sheds light on how to choose the right model, offers advice from Jack Stack and more.
Get startedLast time, I talked about 9 business words I’d like to choke: Impactful. Leverage. Synergy. (Read the whole list here).
Why is this under my skin lately? Because as business on the social web becomes increasingly human (conversing on Twitter, and blogging, and on Facebook, and all that), it’s time we watch the words we use to express who we (and our brands) are.
As I said last time: It isn’t just me who feels this way, I discovered. A quick poll on Twitter revealed an astounding agreement on the business words we hear but hate. (And even sometimes use, try as we might to avoid it.)
Here are 8 more words and phrases that I’d like to ban from marketing, sales, corporate communications, business schools, blogs and boardrooms.
1. Incenting/incentivizing. Sales folks and mid-level managers love these darlings. You shouldn’t. Try: “encourage," "provide incentive."
2. Almost any word that ends in “-ize.” Including the one above as well as: “productize,” “monetize,” “budgetize,” “utilize,” “socialize,” “operationalize,” and even “optimize,” (although I know the search engine people will argue about that last one). Try: Finding a word that doesn’t sound like it was first uttered by the robot on Lost in Space.
3. Solution. Business people often use this word to describe or product or service they can’t otherwise explain. Try… um… “[software] product” or “service.”
4. Almost any word rooted in technology applied to humans. Including: “ping” to mean “follow up,” “bandwidth” to mean “capacity,” or “offline” to mean either “not working” or “outside of this already horribly long meeting.” Instead: Use words that describe what humans do, not machines.
5. A whole bunch of words that used to be good, solid words, and now have been overused to the point of meaninglessness: Robust. Granular. Box (but only when you are Out of the -). Strategic. Space (as applies to the market you are in). Traction.
6. Another class of words that individually are harmless, but mashed together become horrid: Buy-in. Mission-critical. Dial-in. Best-of-breed. End-to-end. Value-add. Next-generation. Face-time. Push-back. Net-net. Win-win. And low-hanging (as it applies to “fruit” when you aren’t talking about an actual tree or orchard).
7. Silly phrases. There are a zillion of these corporate-speak silly phrases: Run it up the flagpole. Eat your own dogfood. Out of pocket. When the rubber meets the road. At the end of the day. Peel the onion. Peel the grape. Open the kimono. Open the kimono at the end of the day while you are peeling an onion. But two I find particularly silly are “moving forward” (as opposed to what? Standing still? Spinning our wheels? Slamming it into reverse?) and “touch base” (because I’d like you to keep your hands off me. Can we just talk?)
8. Finally, here are two more I dislike: “Nazi” when applied to business concepts (as in “brand Nazi”) or “drinking the Kool-Aid” as applied to accepting ideas or concepts (sometimes, without understanding). Since these two phrases are rooted in unfortunate and regrettable events in history, using them seems offensive or (at the very least) in bad taste.
So what about you? What business words do you think we should ban?
Special thanks to those helpful people on Twitter who helped compile this list (and made me laugh):
Special thanks to those helpful people on Twitter who helped compile this list (and made me laugh):
@Brainzooming, @seemills, @jkgala99, @KellyeCrane, @AnthologyMonica, @adamkmiec, @followlinus, @mbbunnell, @debmaue, @useglobalreach, @alambchop, @irenekoehler, @kpedraja, @laceyhaines, @FromChristina, @johnmccrory, @evengenius, @2020_Innovation, @maddiegrant, @DawnPappas, @jmrichmond, @zoziku, @JenKaneCo, @tamadear, @adamkmiec, @jblock, @klingaman, @jamiewalker19, @patrickstrother (via @betsyschro via @LornaLyle)
BIO: Ann Handley is the Chief Content Officer of MarketingProfs. Follow her on Twitter @marketingprofs.
Image credit: jetheriot
Can we get rid of "circle back around"? Who brought that one to the party? Uh-oh, I think I just used one.
I would rather use terms like "Sea Foam" - it is pretty but there is no substance.
Great article and great comments! Let's remember, people, the period goes INSIDE the quotation marks--always!
John: If I allow you "solution" and "leverage," can I trade you for some others you might have used? Like "impactful" or, God forbid, "monetize"? ; )
Natasha: I love "for all intensive" purposes, too.. and don't even get me going on people who substitute "orientated" for "oriented."
.....and, of course, I made a spelling error!
I think the phrase that bugs me the most is "For all intents and purporses" or, even worse, "for all intensive purposes".
Hi Ann - I'm duly chastened, as I'm writing a book and using a number of your banned words and phrases!
I believe it's o.k. to use just about any word, as long as its precise meaning fits what it is you are trying to communicate. I like "solution," for example, when it applies to the solving of a client problem. Sometimes it's the most accurate word for the job. For points of concentrated influence, the word, "leverage" has a meaning that's distinct, and more apt, than "use" or "rely on."
So, I'm not an absolutist on these issues -- every dog has its day in the sun, and the same is true for words and (even zany) phrases. Where I wholeheartedly agree with you is how these words proliferate like weeds when they are used reflexively, simply because they are in the buzz-o-sphere (oops, there's another one)
My comments, of course, are simply a way to rationalize my reluctance to go back and rewrite approved chapters. So I feel better now. :> )
Thanks for your provocative posts and I look forward to future ones. JB
Excellent article(s) I especially agree with the use of Nazi as anything but what it really stands for, it's particularly offensive and I see it being hurled around way to often, in jest and as insults.
Hoo-whee! What a fun topic! Here are a few to consider:
Craft, as in, "We need to craft a response to this issue."
Healthy Debate. Meaning what? We discussed it without calling each other names? We talked about it at the gym?
Simplistic, when what you really mean to say is "simple," as in "our plan is quite simplistic."
Iterative, as in, "Our budget is an iterative process." You mean, we do a few versions of it before we call it good?
Dialogue/Dialoguing. Can we talk?
Vis a Vis. No we aren't going to kiss your arm because you spoke French.
Thanks!
Thanks for chiming in everyone... ! Great (and funny) stuff!
Mark's comments reminded me another one of my favorites -- when folks start a sentence with, " "Truthfully.... " or "In truth,..."
As opposed to what? All the lies you've told me up until now?!
; )
Classic. Let's not forget "Turn-Key solutions" . I love hearing about company's offering "Best of Breed" solutions. I think if you asked any company, they would all admit to being "Best of Breed". How about "Game changer" . Another gem.
Classic. Let's not forget "Turn-Key solutions" . I love hearing about company's offering "Best of Breed" solutions. I think if you asked any company, they would all admit to being "Best of Breed". How about "Game changer" . Another gem.
This is a great start! Let's get rid of "absolutely". Maybe you could run it up the flagpole to see if you get buy-in or push-back?
And how about getting rid of "outside the box"? I did not know that I was always thinking "inside a box" until one day someone challenged me....over and over again....to think "outside the box". What a relief! I thought I was going "postal" (oops, better get rid of than one, too).
But seriously, now that I am absolutely thinking outside the box all the time, I can breath easy because I am "one step ahead" of the competition. Or maybe I am "leaps and bounds" ahead?
But my "personal opinion" is.......do I have any others? Imagine saying "My non-personal opinion is.....uh...hmmmm?"
Let's consider getting rid of "absolutely".
Good one Ann.
So true about the use of machine talk at the expense of the human touch. All one needs to do to keep their own "speak" in check is to present social media strategy to a group that doesn't breath in the tech or corporate bubble.
I'm currently preparing a presentation to a non-profit group so they can fund the use of social media to improve donor relationships. These people don't "engage" their donors. Rather, they talk to them and want to find better ways to listen.
Brilliant. (I borrowed that from my Brit friends)
@rainesmaker
Great article. As a designer surfing the wave of the internet transformation (uh-oh did i just use a word or phrase that gets a thumbs down"surfing the wave" could be a candidate I suppose) but the hottest one i *** the most is "thought leader". Yikes! if everyone is a thought leader who is following?
Other candidates:
Search Engine Optimization
SOCIAL
buzz
its not about sales or promotion
more to come son Im sure
Cheers (never sick of that word)
Peter
www.visibleworks.com
Hysterical. I could not agree more with you Ann. Ironically, when I worked at American Express years ago (huge buzzword company) the words "going forward" particularly galled me, so I vowed never to utter them again and only use "from here..."
It's literally 13 years in business later for me, and in that time I can faithfully admit I have never had those words leave my mouth despite working for another huge buzzword company, Intuit. And you know what? I'm pretty proud of myself for this silly little stand against the crush of corporate blandisms. Thanks so much for bringing a huge chuckle to my day and you should know you are tapping into a rich vein of *** frustrations against the de-humanizing aspects of our world.
Best, Paul
www.fanminder.com
Have a New Year's Resolution to cut costs?
Get a head start with our latest crash course, Cutting Business Costs.
Javascript is currently disabled. Please enable javascript for the optimal OPEN Forum experience.
Robert "Bob" Butler, CSTE 1 year 7 months and 15 days ago
The mention of sea foam is a bit too close to my comment about "circle back around"; they are not in any way similar. I did not mean to imply they were synonymous. Oops.