Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Open.com Navigation
Can you recognize signs that your company's culture isn't working? Get advice from the experts on what to look for–and how to fix it.
Learn moreWhat determines how much money you -- an entrepreneur -- will make from your next startup? I think we can agree that it’s an important question.
Most entrepreneurs (and investors) would answer that question by rattling off catch phrases like market size, team, pain point and beyond. Few, however, would mention a “financing strategy”. Despite the fact that how an entrepreneur finances their business can be one of the single largest determinants of how much money they make, financing strategy is not at the fore of the collective startup consciousness.
Who wants to focus on how to finance anyway? It’s boring and there are really only two major options: 1) raise money from a big-name-deep-pocket VC, swim in lavish salaries, throw money at your problems and glow with prestige, or 2) eat ramen, get a day job, suffer your family’s accusations of insanity, sweat credit card bills and bootstrap your way to profitability.
Sounds like an easy choice, right? Well, sometimes the easier path is less fruitful.
The fallacy that underlies the lack of emphasis on financing strategy is the assumption that venture capital can be a good financing option for any type of company. An entrepreneur is always better off taking a VC’s money, right? Here’s the catch: that’s not true. Entrepreneurs who are running companies that are not poised to generate venture scale returns are likely to make less money when they exit if they raise VC.
Here’s why:
First, when a VC invests they’ll have their sights set on a mid-to-large size exit -- small VCs seek $50M+ exits, larger VCs target $100M or more. A $25 million sale, as a result, isn’t interesting to most VCs. If the potential of your company falls short of those expectations, your VC investors will be disappointed. And, rather than take the small exit offer that doesn’t move the needle for their venture fund (but would give you a life changing payout), they’ll push the company to raise more money and pursue new avenues for growth in the hope of getting a bigger payday. Sometimes those new business ideas work, and sometimes they fail, leaving the founders diluted by the additional investment.
Second, if your company is likely to plateau at a relatively small (by venture capital standards) valuation, a standard venture capital round will typically put more money into your company than you need, over diluting the founders, as VCs often need to deploy a good bit of capital into each of their investments to make their own economics work.
Want more tips on raising capital? Check these stories out: Don’t get me wrong -- VC isn’t bad. In fact, it can be great if your company is poised to scale. If your company is set to scale and you don’t raise venture capital, you may be under funding your business allowing fast-followers to acquire your customers before you. So how do you know if your company is poised to generate a large enough exit to justify raising venture capital? The best approach is to calculate your addressable market. Your addressable market is defined as the total revenue that your company could generate if it captured 100 percent of its viable customers. To do this analysis correctly, you’ll need to be thoughtful about who realistically might buy your product -- factor in geography, age, wealth and behavior and make realistic assumptions about how much revenue you can generate per customer. You’re not likely to capture the whole addressable market, but if things go well and your company is targeting a billion-dollar-plus addressable market, it’s believable that you could generate a $100M+ exit. If the addressable market is south of $100M, you’re probably chasing an opportunity that isn’t likely to be a fit for the expectations of today’s VCs. The key is to align your financing strategy with your company’s potential. In a simplified world, that boils down to bootstrapping if your company’s potential is relatively small, and raising venture capital if you’re building a giant. Hint: The other critical dimensions of the financing decisions relate to your capital needs and inherent barriers -- I’ll address those in my next post. Mark Davis a NY-based entrepreneur, venture capitalist, blogger and community organizer. Mark is currently the co-founder & CEO of a stealth startup. Previously, he was a venture capitalist at DFJ Gotham Ventures and founder of the Columbia Venture Community and New York Venture Community. You can find him at www.mpd.me and @markpeterdavis.
Hey - Atlanta VCs - I told you so.
Venture Capitalists with courage to write a check on concept. Innovator supply time of business plan rarely means much now. The biggest success I have heard in Angel or VC areas is modest check written on the spot. Business plan formalities cost too much time in any rapidly evolving marketplace. Examples of Angel or VC money on the spot making the success happen, Google and Andreas Bechtolsheim (angel) and Apple with Mike Markkula (venture capital).Each case was a no fuss $100,000 to spark their engines of growth. Now bootstrap activities are more common. So their is a competition for angel or venture capital money to prove to possible future winners before they just become yet another round of funding two or three times removed from the sweetest gold of the action.My case, well bootstrap for now is the way for me to suggest for most. The time waiting on capital can cost much of the opportunity. Business plans are in my humble opinion an exercise of inflexible conceptualization. Since the main demands for these were banks, well now they are so hamstrung from regulatory issues, my point of view is to ask the capital source, follow me to the promised land and ye shall receive the largest bounty.The rest will just have to get in on second, third or even fourth rounds of finance and expect dilution positions much the same way Goldman Sachs will move Facebook equity in the next so many months. Profit potential, but as in the base of Bechtolsheim and Markkula, zero decent potential to demonstrate how they made their mark in history. That is something few investors get to have as a dividend, their bite of history in the bytes forming our modern society credited with a oh so pleasant return that is the envy of all those whose courage has yet to march forth on the idea, where the peak return resides.
Thanks for the reminder that investors want to make money (and generally a certain percentage within a designated timeframe), not simply help someone realize their business dream. You've also make an excellent point that it is wise to negotiate the funding deal and watch the valuations (of the founder's share) so that the great ideas and hard work pay off.
I think this is such an important article for entrepreneurs to read, especially coming from a venture capitalist. Sometimes it seems like entrepreneurs aspire to raise venture capital instead of aspiring to create a world changing, profitable company. I actually featured an interesting company on my blog the other day that helps entrepreneurs through the process of raising capital from friends and family. It is really just a bootstrappers tool called LendingKarma. My review of the company is available at http://bit.ly/e7G5fx Thanks again for the article. It was good to hear.
Earn 76+ IQ Points
Do you know what’s deductible for travel and entertainment? What about payroll and legal? Or net operating losses? Tax expert Barbara Weltman explains all this and more.
Javascript is currently disabled. Please enable javascript for the optimal OPEN Forum experience.
Dalmo Accorsini 1 year 3 months and 14 days ago
For my business "The Health Factory Farm, Inc" it was impossible to convince anybody to invest. The economy was in the tank and the money just was not there! I kept going with what I had at the time. The result is Organic E.V.E (www.organic-eve.com) a boutique farm growing special varieties of rare tomatoes for up scale customers, and also I created a Magazine (100% produced in house) called Nutricula "The Science of Longevity Journal" (www.nutricula-u.com) right now I'm counting my blessings for not getting an investor.